Women in the Second World War Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Women in the Second World War - Case Study Example While Germany, Italy, and other allies seized majority of Europe, President Roosevelt of the US accepted to back Britain. Concisely, due to the significant booming of the Harbor of Pearl, the US president declared a war through the congress. Consequently, with the declaration of war by President Roosevelt, Hitler responded by declaring war on the US; hence the commencement of WW II (Library of congress, 2011). The exhibition has featured numerous women chosen based on their strength, as well as, variety in the library collections. Significantly, similar to their friends, they concentrated on certain ways in their wartime assignments. This document has selected three from the eight women in order to explore a comparison, as well as, a contrast in order to reveal who was significant in the exhibition. For instance, all women in WW II employed photographs in their elaboration of what happened in the WW II. Accordingly, my document has chosen Therese Bonney, Esther Bubley, and Toni Frissell. Considerably the three women attracted about million viewers with their WW II images. However, they differ significantly because Bonney’s pictures portrayed images of numerours homeless nurses, soldiers in the front line, WACs, afro- American airmen, and numerous orphaned children. In contrast, Bubbley’s images portrayed wartime subjects around the capital of the nation. In addition, her ima ges portrayed the life of the city, especially the boarding houses for workers of the war. It is worth noting that, Bonney’s images reveal that, she could go forth alone and try to establish the truth and bring it back by trying to make the others intermingle with it and act on it. Therefore, she believed that, the emergency of the WW II had significantly threatened civilization in Europe. Consequently, Bonney wanted to reveal that, people would find measures I order to end the war. Another critical point of contrast was Frissell’s desire t

Explain Aristotle's Notion of Substance Research Paper

Explain Aristotle's Notion of Substance - Research Paper Example It will be argued along with Leszl's claim that substance is more than just a category for logic, and that it is really an argument for the nature of being. There is no separating logic from ontology in Aristotle when it comes to substance and it with regard to ontology, substance is that which is constant set against everything else which changes. The context in which "first substance" emerges, concerns the "combination of words, expressions and phrases." (Categories, 1a16). Aristotle first divides these kategoriai of words, expressions and phrases by distinguishing how some predicates are are "present" in a subject, while others are "parts within a whole" (Categories, 1a20), which is marked by a difference between something "which cannot exist apart from the subject referred to", such as an attribute like "whiteness" (Categories, 1a24-1b2), and something which can be attributed but which is not found phenomenally "in a subject", such as predicating the species "man" to an individua l man, as a subject. Aristotle adds that there may also be predicates which can be asserted of a subject, and yet which are neither present physically, or related in a genus-individual relation. These kategoriai he raises as particular or individual expressions with a direct object, or direct reference: "this or that man or horse, for example" (Categories, 1b4), which is a form of predication related to both substance, and the mind, and will be outlined in more detail in the section dealing with De Anima. At this point in the Categories, Aristotle is explicit about this instance of substance as being "primary" (Categories, 1b11-13), and it is therefore a topic which is not a question for the agenda at hand, which are the rules of "combination of words, expressions and phrases"-- or, "secondary substance" (Categories, 1b14). He proceeds at this point to establish further specifications for the rules of predication, such as predicate of a subject, is also a predicate of a substance(Ca tegories, 1b9-15, 1b21-25), and how some predicates may help to differentiate genus's, but not species (Categories, 1b16-20), and finally how "each uncombined word or expression" will be determined by a particular form of possible predicate. Having covered the possible predicates in terms of their forms, relation via genus, species, and how whether the predicate is necessarily "present" in a subject or not, he addresses the criteria itself which determines all of these possible combination's and types of combination's, which is the first important step into substance-- a step which more clearly divides primary from secondary substances, and a division which can be characterized as a division between substance (primary) and subject (secondary). Aristotle gives the simple example that "`Footed', `two-footed' and `winged'" are attributes which are true of genus, but which do not allow for the distinction of a particular species, given that many species possess these attributes.(Categor ies, 1b16-20). Primary substance is more a topic proper to the Physics and Metaphysics, given that actual being and actual beings are the focus, not, as in the Categories with how these beings can be "expressed". As we shall see, the Metaphysics addresses